Wait a Second... Have I Been Fighting A One Person War Against the CIA for a Decade?
Sometimes, my brain mashes facts together in a way that has me forming questions. Or constructing weird chimeras of concepts. Most logic operates on an "If A and If B then perhaps C?". My logic is "Train A is leaving Chicago, but the air speed velocity of an unladen swallow in noneuclidean space streams past a trolley--why are you not turning the tortoise in the desert over?"... which... is not particularly constructive for explaining things
After I get my conclusions I can then go back, figure out how I am off, and adjust things. Or if it turns out I am somewhat accurate (well... not completely inaccurate), I can then figure out something that emulates how most people believe logic looks like, in order to have people less inclined to dismiss it
Think like if the Three Stooges found the "this is my hole, it was made for me"... except they are all convinced that their hole is the same hole. So they are all trying to get into that hole from that infamous horror Manga at the same time. The end result is an interesting mess of sorts. Often resembling the analogy I just gave where I slammed the Three Stooges in with that often memed horror Manga. Like... wow... really messed up image to throw together
The Requirement For What People Believe Logic Looks Like
"Having a quote at the top of an entry, is a great way to make a section meet the professional level of quality that official publications have" -- Johnathan Wernstrum, Business Blogs for Success
See... people believe that any major thought or advancement in idea comes from people with big foreheads and very light coloured skin, sitting in a circle, heavily applying the concepts and ideas of logic
Take all the logic... and just logic extra hard. Super hard logic action. Just logic your brain out. Eventually this will result in new advances in society. Which is believed to always to be advancing forward. Claims that all new technology is technology that will stay--and that there are no more hunter-gather societies anymore
Now, all of this is absolute tosh. That is not how anything actually works... but well... people believe that this is how stuff operates. Even when somebody is able to be correct, while looking all random and weird--they will decide the being slightly odd is an outward act in order to hide how hard they are just logicing in the core of their being
This is part of how people don't want a reasonable answer. They want an answer that looks reasonable
Part of that, is taking stuff, and playing out into the conclusions is something a room full of people with really pale skin and tall foreheads just logicing like nuts all logically logic like
So here we go. Spoilers: it is actually the Planet Venus and Swamp Gas. Did you know President of the USA mistook the Planet Venus for something that is not the Planet Venus? Do you really think you are smarter than an American President? Kind of arrogant to think like that
History of the SJWsonna
"Look, it is a well known fact, that people who are against dragons ruling with terror over various villages of humans are unreasonable feminine people with shrill voices. There are plenty of examples of these sorts that I have left alive throughout my countryside, out of my warm dragon heart, to prove questioning me is not something good quality people should do. I mean, being crazy is being a harm to yourself and others--and well..." -- Frigyth The Grumpy, Musings Before Ketchup
Now, there is a bit of history leading up to this point. See look--logic, I'm showing that this is a singular direction to head thoughts into. History only goes in one possible direction--that is what the image of logical logic people logicing requires to have in order to properly emulate it
Now, I've stated in the past in various places (I could look up _where_ but meh... effort), that a fair amount of agitation in leftist/progressive groups are from three parties:
- Abusive people using progessive imagery to allow them to be abusive. Their actions do not match their imagery... but people aren't good at telling the difference between Branding and Product
- Kids trying to figure out how to fit in with people who give a crap about other people, who get some stuff a bit off. Think like the stuff Jaden Smith posted as a child--yeah, that is a child posting that. Give that child some of the material of the topic, so they can enjoy reading up something they find interesting. Wait, no, the "logical reasonable" thing of logical logic logiccing logicers is to be a douche bag to a child--guess I am being cray cray again
- People of opposing political agendas pretending to be leftist/progressive, in order to saboteur the whole thing
Now, people have generally been being all, "it is prolly mostly just dumb kids"--but like, that relies on a mindset of "fsck dem kids" to really view as the most reasonable approach. I mean... kids can seem dumb from a lack of life experience... but like... are they _that_ stupid? Are kids really that smooth brained? Or, as the kids have stopped saying due to it being dated... are kids really that skibbidi ohio rizz? (I am so good at being so close to current, while not actually being current)
That third entry on that unnumbered list is the focus of this history here, so that I can emulate logical logic logicing logicers of logic in order to have my words function with people of the current social world
At first my understanding of that third entry of the above unnumbered list was largely people doing it to get screenshots for various "SJW FAILS" for clout in various groups that laugh at how dumb "them soy wokerists" are. With a good chunk of those screenshots for a good period of time being clearly faked in various ways. Often times it was via the person making an SJWsonna to pretend to be stupid, for his other real account to mock how stupid his SJWsonna looks
These days, you can get the same result via stripping context of what is said. Or by applying colour filters over what is said to communicate to the people at home what is being said is unreasonable. As well, that is part of how the Image of Logic operates for people. I'm fairly certain if I gave my blog the colour scheme of rational reasonable thinking people, it would ultimately work to have more people view these blogs as reasonable things to read. Well... would it make them reasonable? Well no, as looking reasonable and being reasonable are two seperate circles that do not come close to justify people making them an OTP (Venn Diagram Shipping FTW)
Did you know that all you have to do to make somebody sound incorrect in a video or audio recoding is to slow down their sound by 25%? You applied the "this guy is really dumb" audio filter
Eventually a money trail was found for various Right Wing Activists on the Internet, to find that while they are all accusing people of taking money from Big Pharma, George Soros, Blackrock Casinos (or something) and Big Science, they themselves have been taking money from the Coch Bros and various foreign intelligence agencies under an operation to disrupt various countries
Now, their money cannot be that much. It likely is mostly pesos and rupples. With the various people in countries that have a higher cost of living mostly just using that to supplement other income they are making. With them mostly just accepting it, as it does not go against their already established brand
It would be seemingly appearingly unreasonable to act like the money is that overly much. And being seemingly reasonable is the very important action I am doing here. Does this prove that they are getting decent money from actual reasonable angles? No--the idea of doing this sort of quick inversion to a conclusion is only part of Looking Reasonable, and not a part of Actually Being Reasonable
Which okay--that... well... that is stupid. But the goal is a very clearly a straight forward one to follow. These parties work better in a Ship of Fools type setting, and are working to create a decent power base by fudging various cultural stuff in their favour
Astroturfing has been a standard part of marketting, PR and image crafting for most of the 21st Century. It is why the AI-Grift Bubble has gone how it has gone. These people had something similar to AI-Psychosis prior to this via how everywhere Astroturfing is for stuff
Well, the CIA has never seen nonsense that was too much nonsense for them to be in any scenario
As it turns out that the CIA has also been doing a fair amount of that third item of the unnumbered list earlier. They've also been running various SJWsonnas in order to disrupt leftist actions and activities
Reasonable Appearing Conclusion: I've Been Fighting the CIA?
"Yeah... we don't go over there. The light sometimes touches there--but we like pretend to not notice the light touching them, so we can just continue avoiding that whole area of stuff. Being all 'What? We did not see the light touching that area. Guess we just missed out on claiming it. Sooooo baaaad.' and just more loudly saying that if pressed" -- Prof Earnest Ernie Earnsteinburg, Oops Reality Is Gone Again, My Bad
So, CIA agents as SJWsonnas is kind of pointless. I'm fairly certain that without that even happening, we'd still have seen the mega rise of Far Right Douche Bags. Various social medias are already weighted in favour of Right Wing (and Far Right) materials. As that stuff is generally better for the people who own those sites to be able to increase how much money they make
Then we also have all the money being used to astroturf far right talking points and ideas. We aren't even talking about that scary story about the head of the KKK robbing a bank, and then starting a stealth media empire to have people believe the KKK aren't a bunch of stupid dorks
The actions of the CIA Agents are just... well... I don't think they've really done much to actually push the needle in any kind of noticable manner. The addition of a CIA Agent _also_ pretending to be a Cat Femboy with hair and pronouns just well... yeah, it appears to have also been going down as well... but like... it kind of feels like an "I'm here too guys" type effort
Now, I've had blows with all three entries on that above unnumbered list. I can generally tell the difference very much long after the fact. In the moment--no real way to actually tell them apart
After the fact, the abusive person putting on an image of progressive, will generally have it become obvious they are full of crap. You cannot do that sort of behaviour for any kind of long term. People tend to pick up on it
With the kids--well, they usually end up being figured out when all their friends disappear and they have no idea where. With the exception of the Abusive Person Putting An Image of Progressive who then screws the kid over
With the SJWsonnas... well... those accounts tend to just disappear. People tend to not keep sock puppet accounts around after they have been active for too long. This is to have it so that people don't clue in to what is happening quicker. Also this runs into the problems that the abusive person mentioned above also runs into. Via having these sock puppets operate in a short term process, they avoid the issues that the abusive person runs into
The thing is... I've been butting heads with all of these sorts since the late-00s. In fact my main interactions with "SJWs" for the early 10s had largely been items number one and three of the unnumbered list. Until I decided to actually go out, and try to find a real legit SJW. Not just an SJWsonna, or somebody pretending to be one for cover. As well... you cannot use a fictional creature for cover
It would be like me using a palm tree for cover in the Yukon. You are creating a situation that does the exact opposite of cover you up
If there were real people that these images were pretending to be--than well, those pretenders would be able to do it for several more years after that (and not have it fizzle out)
Well, I found actual leftists: punkers, activists, et al.. Did not ever find a "real live SJW" as it turns out the image of these sorts... does not quite match reality
This has been really helpful for me ferretting out SJWsonnas. What is more, me acknowledging this difference has also spread to others that also kind of recognise them. Though with enough false positives, that you will sometimes get an Abusive Person Pretending to be Progressive attempt to do this to get out a person who they've decided is a threat to them--but that is generally a bad strategy. Often backfiring and showing the true face of the abusive person
This has had me at odds with all three items of that unnumbered list often for over a decade now (less so prior to 2012--like it happened... but sparingly)
Now, using the appearance of logic to have this seem reasonable to other people: statistically the CIA's task force of pretend cat femboys (who might also be real cat femboys when off the clock, but pretending to be different fake cat femboys for pay) would have numbered decently in the crowd of the third entry of that above unnumbered list
Statistically speaking, I have been getting into online spats with the CIA for over a decade, in regards to political topics as part of a political warfare tactic that for whatever reason the CIA decided it was worth its time to engage with
Though, the conclusion that "I've been fighting a one person war against the CIA" still cannot Appear Logical--on the grounds that only crazy people disagree with our glorious government overlords. You have a problem with the CIA--well clearly you MUST be crazy. As cited with the history of people that were driven mad via the CIA (and sometimes also FBI) fscking with them. Since they ended up crazy at the end, the Reasonable Appearing conclusion is to decide they were always crazy... and that we can definitely trust the CIA. Anybody questioning them is crazy... or will soon will have always been known to be crazy... which for the purposes of Appearing Logical is the same thing (pretty much)
Clearly it was actually swamp gas, weather balloons and the planet Venus. Oh hey... what is this... IT IS THE BARN OWL ENTERING THE ARENA WITH A STEEL CHAIR!!!!
-=-
We are in the dumbest timeline
Comments
Post a Comment